As I produce Elearning content today, I use all of the latest and greatest tools. Some of the new tools can produce interactive video to reinforce complicated processes in applications. Whereas before I would write up procedures to implement functions in applications, have a workshop to demonstrate how to use the functions, give handouts with the written steps, let everyone try it for their selves and they would still call me back and say, could you stop by and show me again how to do this? No more, I just point them to the video and it steps them through the process having them repeat each step as it goes through it and they get it. They just needed some reinforcement and practice. Meanwhile I can move on to the next project and they are trained again by a virtual representation of my workshop. It seems to work well. It does take more work on my part; I do have to produce the video. My students do benefit in that they can get the training whenever they need it; instant access with practice for reinforcement. They do not have to wait for me to stop by or have another workshop. This all leads me to the old tar and mortar classroom where you had to go to class and learn at the professor’s command. If you were sick or in a fog, you had to scramble, get the lesson and learn the required information as best you could. The professor on the other hand was strapped with making sure the information was available and accessible and he/she was ties to specific times and the calendar as well. It has been a long difficult process to bring about learning on demand but we all benefit, learner and teacher. The Keller Plan is the model I want to follow. I do state clear objectives; establish small learning units and by creating self paced interactive videos my students get positive reinforcement by successfully repeating steps and seeing the desired results. Currently I am a technology trainer but this technique will work for online courses in math (a great way to teach Algebra II) and computer science which I have also taught in the classroom and would like to teach on the web in the future.


January 23, 2010 at 6:12 pm
Your point about using the Keller plant to do technology training, as well as topics like math and computer science certainly highlights the issue of the suitability of topics for this method. Or the appropriateness of this method for certain topics. Modularity and linearity don’t work for everything and, like Kevin mentioned in his presentation, a criticism of the plan is that it does not address higher-order thinking and learning. This is not necessarily bad, it is, I think, indicative of the fact that certain types of information lend themselves more to different teaching methods.
January 24, 2010 at 11:25 am
Videos are so great! I teach a lot of hands-on skills, so I do the same thing you do by creating videos. Yes, there is the production of it, but once it’s done, it’s done! I no more have to spend umpteen hours repeating demonstrations! And thankfully with new technologies, it is much easier to edit the videos instead of having to create a totally new one when you need to change something.
Mary Ellen
January 25, 2010 at 6:35 pm
I agree, demonstration videos are a good representation of this model, like the skill-based trainings with screen shots you see produced through tools like Camstudio.